Legal Theory 20 (3):186-209 (2014)

Authors
Aaron Maltais
Stockholm Environment Institute
Abstract
Christopher Wellman is the strongest proponent of the natural-duty theory of political obligations and argues that his version of the theory can satisfy the key requirement of ; namely, justifying to members of a state the system of political obligations they share in. Critics argue that natural-duty theories like Wellman's actually require well-ordered states and/or their members to dedicate resources to providing the goods associated with political order to needy outsiders. The implication is that natural-duty approaches weaken the particularity requirement and cannot justify to citizens the systems of political obligation they share in. I argue that the critics’ diagnosis of natural-duty approaches is correct, whereas the proposed implication is false. I maintain that 1) only natural-duty approaches can justify political obligations, and that 2) weakening the particularity requirement contributes to the theory's ability to justify a range-limited system of political obligations among compatriots.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1352325214000135
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Are There Any Natural Rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.Michael Blake - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3):257-296.
Justification and Legitimacy.A. John Simmons - 1999 - Ethics 109 (4):739-771.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fair-Play Obligations and Distributive Injustice.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (2):147488511877862.
Fair-Play Obligations and Distributive Injustice.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (2):167-186.
Content-Independence and Natural-Duty Theories of Political Obligation.Jiafeng Zhu - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (1):61-80.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Political Obligations.George Klosko (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Citizenship and Obligation.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - forthcoming - In Julie Dickson & Pavlos Eleftheriadis (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
Associative Political Obligations.Bas van der Vossen - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (7):477-487.
Rawls and "Duty-Based" Accounts of Political Obligation.Simon Cushing - 1999 - APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 99 (1):67-71.
Political Naturalism and State Authority.Edward Song - 2012 - Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (1):64-77.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-12-29

Total views
309 ( #29,674 of 2,448,712 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #57,872 of 2,448,712 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes