Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy

Oxford University Press (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The discussion of whether psychopaths are morally responsible for their behaviour has long taken place in philosophy. In recent years this has moved into scientific and psychiatric investigation. Responsibility and Psychopathy discusses this subject from both the philosophical and scientific disciplines, as well as a legal perspective.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,125

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Similar books and articles

Defending PCL-R.Luca Malatesti & John McMillan - 2010 - In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Psychopathy and answerability.Antony Duff - 2010 - In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 198-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-14

Downloads
109 (#138,059)

6 months
3 (#336,761)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luca Malatesti
University of Rijeka

Citations of this work

Is Psychopathy a Harmful Dysfunction?Marko Jurjako - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (5):1-23.
The Kindness of Psychopaths.Zdenka Brzović, Marko Jurjako & Predrag Šustar - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):189-211.
The societal response to psychopathy in the community.Marko Jurjako, Luca Malatesti & Inti Angelo Brazil - 2022 - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 66 (15):1523–1549.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references