HEC Forum 31 (2):91-102 (2019)

Abstract
Ethical reasoning is an integral part of the work of a clinical ethics consultant. Ethical reasoning has a close relationship with an individual’s beliefs and values, which, for religious adherents, are likely to be tightly connected with their spiritual perspectives. As a result, for individuals who identify with a religious tradition, the process of thinking through ethical questions is likely to be influenced by their religious worldview. The connection between ethical reasoning and one’s spiritual perspective raises questions about the role that CECs’ personal religious worldviews should play in their professional lives and their consultative work. This paper offers numerous arguments critiquing the inclusion of a consultant’s own spiritual perspective in her work and has identified only limited circumstances under which such inclusion might be permissible. In particular, these arguments lead to the conclusion that a CEC’s personal beliefs should never influence her ethical analysis or development of a recommendation. Further, religious appeals should not be used in communication during decision-making conversations other than to describe the patient or surrogate’s stated perspective. There may be limited cases in which a CEC may share her spiritual worldview with a patient with the intent of building a collaborative relationship, but such situations should be approached with extreme caution.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-018-9363-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Conscientious Objection in Medicine.Mark R. Wicclair - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (3):205–227.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Religious and Non-Religious Beliefs in Medical Decisions.Atsushi Asai & Yasuhiro Kadooka Aizawa - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (6):162-165.
Religious Beliefs as World-View Beliefs.Winfried Löffler - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):7-25.
The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
The Ethical Role of the Consultant.William B. Weeks & William A. Nelson - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):477.
Bhikkhu Buddhadāsa on Ethics and Society.Donald K. Swearer - 1979 - Journal of Religious Ethics 7 (1):54 - 64.
Why Physicians Should Not Do Ethics Consults.Frank H. Marsh - 1992 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (3).
The Religious Ethics of Labor.Fred Glennon & Vincent Lloyd - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (2):217-229.
Lack of Business Responsibility: An Islamic Perspective.Zahid Parvez - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (1):42-55.
On Being a Consultant in Business Ethics.Robert Es - 1993 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 2 (4):228-232.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-18

Total views
12 ( #788,281 of 2,454,420 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,420 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes