The Purpose and Limits of Electoral Accountability

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard theory of electoral accountability treats the electorate as an appraiser of government performance on a range of complex issues, who re-elect or de-elect depending on their evaluation of that performance. This paper draws from studies on voter knowledge and behaviour to present a dilemma for the standard theory: either voters do not know how well their rulers have performed, or if they do, they do not base their votes on that knowledge. It is shown that, on either horn of the dilemma, the standard account of electoral accountability fails, and that attempts to deflate the dilemma through heuristic and aggregative approaches to voter knowledge, or proposals for alternative systems of government, are also inadequate. The paper then sets out and defends an alternative conception of electoral accountability, which holds that electoral accountability is not about micro-assessing a government’s actions. Rather, it is about preventing political rulers from committing or allowing substantial harms to come upon those they govern. This alternative conception is compatible with a realistic view of voter knowledge and behaviour, but nonetheless makes electoral accountability an essential component of a well-functioning democratic system.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lottocracy and deliberative accountability.Hubertus Buchstein - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1):40-44.
Electoral Reform in Asia: Institutional Engineering against 'Money Politics'.Olli Hellmann - 2014 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 15 (2):275-298.
The electoral system as a factor in the effiiency of rotating elites and democratic changes in Ukraine.G. Shhedrova - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4:24-30.
Screening before Sanctioning.Francisco Herreros - 2006 - European Journal of Political Theory 5 (4):415-435.
Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative.Alexander A. Guerrero - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2):135-178.
Higher Education and Problems of Citizenship Formation.Morgan White - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (1):112-127.
Higher Education and Problems of Citizenship Formation.Morgan White - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):112-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-24

Downloads
115 (#113,122)

6 months
47 (#33,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Finlay Malcolm
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

On Epistocracy's Epistemic Problem: Reply to MĂ©ndez.Adam F. Gibbons - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8):1-7.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Epistocracy Irrational?Adam F. Gibbons - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (2).

Add more references