The Squirrel and the State

The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387 (2010)
Robert Nozick famously argued that acknowledging that individuals have certain fundamental natural or prepolitical rights to their lives and property does not preclude the legitimacy of the state, as the individualist anarchist would claim. The reason is that “a state would arise from anarchy. . . even though no one intended this or tried to bring it about, by a process which need not violate anyone’s rights”. Many doubts have been raised about some of the claims that Nozick needs to make to reach this conclusion. Doubts have also been raised about the normative relevance of that conclusion for the moral evaluation of states that did not arise in such a way. But even if all these doubts were unfounded, Nozick’s argument falls short of justifying what, according to the anarchist challenge, is in need of justification. This shortcoming is significant because it reminds us about the true nature of the problem that the state poses for any philosophical outlook grounded on a theory of natural, libertarian rights.
Keywords Nozick  political legitimacy  terminological disputes
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Nozick's Reply to the Anarchist.Helga Varden - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585 - 616.
Whither Anarchy? Has Robert Nozick Justified the State?Randy Barnett - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):15-21.
Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State.Murray Rothbard - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57.
Has Nozick Justified the State?Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):411-415.
Toward a Theory of Empirical Natural Rights.John Hasnas - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):111-147.
Nozick and Locke: Filling the Space of Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):81-110.
II. Nozick's Entitlements.Onora O'Neill - 1976 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):468-481.
Robert Nozick.David Schmidtz (ed.) - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
26 ( #213,628 of 2,210,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #380,811 of 2,210,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature