The Independent Review 14 (3):377-387 (2010)
Robert Nozick famously argued that acknowledging that individuals have certain fundamental natural or prepolitical rights to their lives and property does not preclude the legitimacy of the state, as the individualist anarchist would claim. The reason is that “a state would arise from anarchy. . . even though no one intended this or tried to bring it about, by a process which need not violate anyone’s rights”. Many doubts have been raised about some of the claims that Nozick needs to make to reach this conclusion. Doubts have also been raised about the normative relevance of that conclusion for the moral evaluation of states that did not arise in such a way. But even if all these doubts were unfounded, Nozick’s argument falls short of justifying what, according to the anarchist challenge, is in need of justification. This shortcoming is significant because it reminds us about the true nature of the problem that the state poses for any philosophical outlook grounded on a theory of natural, libertarian rights.
|Keywords||Nozick political legitimacy terminological disputes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nozick's Reply to the Anarchist What He Said and What He Should Have Said About Procedural Rights.Helga Varden - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (6):585-616.
Whither Anarchy? Has Robert Nozick Justified the State?Randy Barnett - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):15-21.
Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State.Murray Rothbard - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):45-57.
Has Nozick Justified the State?Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):411-415.
Review of Dale F. Murray, Nozick, Autonomy and Compensation. [REVIEW]Peter Vallentyne - 2007 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (12).
The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Ralf M. Bader & John Meadowcroft (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Toward a Theory of Empirical Natural Rights.John Hasnas - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):111-147.
Libertarianism and the Possibility of the Legitimate State.Nicolas Maloberti - 2009 - Libertarian Papers 1 (5):1-12.
Nozick and Locke: Filling the Space of Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):81-110.
Natural Rights Liberalism From Locke to Nozick.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
The Shape of Lockean Rights: Fairness, Pareto, Moderation, and Consent.Richard J. Arneson - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):255-285.
Added to index2011-01-07
Total downloads24 ( #202,365 of 2,143,564 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,273 of 2,143,564 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.