Two theories of resistance in the German Enlightenment

History of European Ideas 44 (4):449-460 (2018)

Abstract

ABSTRACTCan there be a legal or a moral right to resist the government? Scholarly interest in the right of resistance has rarely focused on German philosophy, which has often been considered unusually committed to authority. Yet, during the Enlightenment German philosophers regularly attempted to justify not just conscientious refusal but also revolution. This essay explores the two dominant justifications, which were based in Wolffian perfectionism and Kantian relational theory. It argues that we can best understand the complexity of these theories of resistance by exploring their contrasting views on the state’s purpose: providing material and spiritual welfare, or establishing freedom as independence.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-05

Downloads
9 (#957,844)

6 months
1 (#388,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

John Locke in the German Enlightenment: An Interpretation.Klaus P. Fischer - 1975 - Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (3):431.
The Basis of the Right to Resistance in the Legal Thought of Arthur Kaufmann.José-Antonio Santos - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 95 (3):352-358.

Author's Profile

Reidar Maliks
University of Oslo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations