Animal rights, animal minds, and human mindreading

Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):84-89 (2006)
Abstract
Do non-human animals have rights? The answer to this question depends on whether animals have morally relevant mental properties. Mindreading is the human activity of ascribing mental states to other organisms. Current knowledge about the evolution and cognitive structure of mindreading indicates that human ascriptions of mental states to non-human animals are very inaccurate. The accuracy of human mindreading can be improved with the help of scientific studies of animal minds. But the scientific studies by themselves do not by themselves solve the problem of how to map psychological similarities (and differences) between humans and animals onto a distinction between morally relevant and morally irrelevant mental properties. The current limitations of human mindreading – whether scientifically aided or not – have practical consequences for the rational justification of claims about which rights (if any) non-human animals should be accorded.
Keywords Animal  Animal Rights  Anthropomorphism  Ethics  Evolution  Mind  Mind Reading
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2005.013086
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,777
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Confining 'Disenhanced'Animals.John Hadley - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):41-46.
Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics.Fredrik Karlsson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):707-720.
What Does Fido Believe?Lisa Bortolotti - 2008 - Think 7 (19):7-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Moral Rights and Animals.H. J. McCloskey - 1979 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):23 – 54.
Animal Rights and Human Needs.Angus Taylor - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
Popular Media and Animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics.Fredrik Karlsson - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):707-720.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

584 ( #2,514 of 2,177,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #54,820 of 2,177,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums