Paralelismul psihofizic ca descriere și paralelismul psihofizic ca soluție

Studii de Istorie a Filosofiei Românești 18:79-90 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The PhD dissertation defended by Ion Petrovici in 1905 triggered criticism related to its sources, method and aim. Although the author made use of the term ‘psychophysical parallelism’ in the title – the critics reproached –, the work had nothing to do with scientific psychology. The following paper discusses the distinction between psychophysical parallelism as description and psychophysical parallelism as solution to the mind–body problem. Only the former can be considered a proper scien­tific approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

TIMP ŞI SPAŢIU ÎN GÂNDIREA ROMÂNEASCĂ.Mona Mamulea (ed.) - 2013 - EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE.
Dialctica închiderii și deschiderii în cultura română modernă.Mona Mamulea (ed.) - 2007 - Bucharest: Romanian Academy Publishing House.
Sunetul fizicii - Acustica fenomenologică.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2018 - Drobeta Turnu Severin: MultiMedia Publishing.
Filosofie - Noțiuni de bază, Volumul 2.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2020 - Drobeta Turnu Severin: MultiMedia Publishing.
Teme filosofice în cultura populară românească.Mona Mamulea (ed.) - 2015 - Bucharest: Romanian Academy Publishing House.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-28

Downloads
15 (#949,647)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mona Mamulea
Institute of Philosophy and Psychology of The Romanian Academy

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references