Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future

Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (2):87-93 (2007)
Abstract
Some authors have argued that the human use of reproductive cloning and genetic engineering should be prohibited because these biotechnologies would undermine the autonomy of the resulting child. In this paper, two versions of this view are discussed. According to the first version, the autonomy of cloned and genetically engineered people would be undermined because knowledge of the method by which these people have been conceived would make them unable to assume full responsibility for their actions. According to the second version, these biotechnologies would undermine autonomy by violating these people’s right to an open future. There is no evidence to show that people conceived through cloning and genetic engineering would inevitably or even in general be unable to assume responsibility for their actions; there is also no evidence for the claim that cloning and genetic engineering would inevitably or even in general rob the child of the possibility to choose from a sufficiently large array of life plans
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2006.016634
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,688
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Relative Importance of Undesirable Truths.Lisa Bortolotti - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):683-690.
Bioethics as Science Fiction.David Gurnham - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):235-246.
Are All Rational Moralities Equivalent?Darryl Gunson - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):238-247.
What Is the Habermasian Perspective in Bioethics?Darryl Gunson - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (2):188-199.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
118 ( #48,542 of 2,237,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #114,528 of 2,237,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature