- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):28-41 (2023)
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or Google’s Bard have shown significant performance on a variety of text-based tasks, such as summarization, translation, and even the generation of new...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reimagining Scholarship: A Response to the Ethical Concerns of AUTOGEN.Hazem Zohny - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):96-99.
Publish with AUTOGEN or Perish? Some Pitfalls to Avoid in the Pursuit of Academic Enhancement via Personalized Large Language Models.Alexandre Erler - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):94-96.
Why Personalized Large Language Models Fail to Do What Ethics is All About.Sebastian Laacke & Charlotte Gauckler - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):60-63.
The Impact of AUTOGEN and Similar Fine-Tuned Large Language Models on the Integrity of Scholarly Writing.David B. Resnik & Mohammad Hosseini - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):50-52.
Large Language Models and Inclusivity in Bioethics Scholarship.Sumeeta Varma - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):105-107.
Is Academic Enhancement Possible by Means of Generative AI-Based Digital Twins?Sven Nyholm - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):44-47.
The Epistemological Danger of Large Language Models.Elise Li Zheng & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):102-104.
Large Language Models and Biorisk.William D’Alessandro, Harry R. Lloyd & Nathaniel Sharadin - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):115-118.
AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs—Reply to the Commentaries.Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp, Nikolaj Møller, Vynn Suren & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (3):6-14.
Rights and Wrongs in Talk of Mind-Reading Technology.Stephen Rainey - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-11.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-07-31
Downloads
49 (#351,333)
6 months
21 (#178,916)
2023-07-31
Downloads
49 (#351,333)
6 months
21 (#178,916)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable.Brian D. Earp, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Jemima Allen, Sabine Salloch, Vynn Suren, Karin Jongsma, Matthias Braun, Dominic Wilkinson, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Annette Rid, David Wendler & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (7):13-26.
Publish with AUTOGEN or Perish? Some Pitfalls to Avoid in the Pursuit of Academic Enhancement via Personalized Large Language Models.Alexandre Erler - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):94-96.
AI and the need for justification (to the patient).Anantharaman Muralidharan, Julian Savulescu & G. Owen Schaefer - 2024 - Ethics and Information Technology 26 (1):1-12.
Meaning by Courtesy: LLM-Generated Texts and the Illusion of Content.Gary Ostertag - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):91-93.
Generative AI and medical ethics: the state of play.Hazem Zohny, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp & John McMillan - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (2):75-76.
References found in this work
Creating a large language model of a philosopher.Eric Schwitzgebel, David Schwitzgebel & Anna Strasser - 2023 - Mind and Language 39 (2):237-259.
The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence.Alberto Giubilini & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (2):169-188.
Ethics of generative AI.Hazem Zohny, John McMillan & Mike King - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (2):79-80.
How to Use AI Ethically for Ethical Decision-Making.Joanna Demaree-Cotton, Brian D. Earp & Julian Savulescu - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (7):1-3.
Use of a Patient Preference Predictor to Help Make Medical Decisions for Incapacitated Patients.A. Rid & D. Wendler - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):104-129.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b65f85844-9bt58 uwo