Different Perspectives on Cross-Compliance

Environmental Values 14 (4):471 - 482 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cross-compliance has proven its effectiveness, as can be shown by looking at the Swiss experience with cross-compliance since 1999. Besides describing the existing cross-compliance practices in Switzerland, the paper shows different perspectives on the efficiency and fairness of cross-compliance. It concludes that transaction cost advantages justify cross-compliance only in few cases. Usually, it will be more efficient to decouple social and environmental policy. The strong support for cross-compliance by the Swiss population is explained by a perceived unfairness in the distribution of property rights between farmers and society. If property rights would be redistributed, there probably would be no more need for cross-compliance

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Handbook of compliance & integrity management: theory and practice.Bleker-van Eyk, C. S. & R. A. M. Houben (eds.) - 2017 - Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
42 (#430,631)

6 months
14 (#178,614)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethical Obligations in a Tragedy of the Commons.Baylor L. Johnson - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (3):271-287.

Add more references