On the space-time ontology of physical theories

Philosophy of Science 49 (4):575-590 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the correspondence with Clarke, Leibniz proposes to construe physical theory in terms of physical (spatio-temporal) relations between physical objects, thus avoiding incorporation of infinite totalities of abstract entities (such as Newtonian space) in physical ontology. It has generally been felt that this proposal cannot be carried out. I demonstrate an equivalence between formulations postulating space-time as an infinite totality and formulations allowing only possible spatio-temporal relations of physical (point-) objects. The resulting rigorous formulations of physical theory may be seen to follow Leibniz' suggestion quite closely. On the other hand, physical assumptions implicit in the postulation of space-time totalities are made explicit in the reconstruction of the space-time versions from the physical-relation versions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,330

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time, topology and physical geometry.Tim Maudlin - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):63-78.
A Note on the Physical Possibility of Transfinite Computation.Wayne Aitken & Jeffrey A. Barrett - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):867-874.
What are physical objects?Ned Markosian - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.
Space and time in particle and field physics.Dennis Dieks - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (2):217-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#221,956)

6 months
1 (#1,003,762)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth Manders
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

A new approach to the relational‐substantival debate.Jill North - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 11:3-43.
Geometry and motion.Gordon Belot - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):561--95.
Rehabilitating relationalism.Gordon Belot - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):35 – 52.
Spacetime, Ontology, and Structural Realism.Edward Slowik - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):147 – 166.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematics without foundations.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):5-22.
Newtonian space-time.Howard Stein - 1967 - Texas Quarterly 10 (3):174--200.
The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence.H. G. Alexander - 1956 - Philosophy 32 (123):365-366.
A Theory of Time and Space.Alfred A. Robb - 1915 - Mind 24 (96):555-561.
Euclid's elements and the axiomatic method.Ian Mueller - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (4):289-309.

View all 7 references / Add more references