Journal of Philosophy 104 (8):403-423 (2007)

Authors
David Manley
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
This essay motivates a revised version of the epistemic condition of safety and then employs the revision to (i) challenge traditional conceptions of apriority, (ii) refute ‘strong privileged access’, and (iii) resolve a well-known puzzle about externalism and self-knowledge.
Keywords epistemology  safety  self-knowledge  sensitivity  privileged access  wide content  a priori  apriority  externalism  semantic externalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0022-362X
DOI 10.5840/jphil2007104813
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,447
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowledge First?Aidan McGlynn - 2014 - Palgrave Macmillian.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Safety Condition for Knowledge.Dani Rabinowitz - 2011 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Lottery Puzzle and Pritchard’s Safety Analysis of Knowledge.Mark McEvoy - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:7-20.
Safety and Epistemic Luck.Avram Hiller & Ram Neta - 2007 - Synthese 158 (3):303 - 313.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
398 ( #16,034 of 2,330,353 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #53,530 of 2,330,353 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes