The automatic and the ballistic: Modularity beyond perceptual processes

Philosophical Psychology 28 (8):1147-1156 (2015)
Authors
Eric Mandelbaum
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
Perceptual processes, in particular modular processes, have long been understood as being mandatory. But exactly what mandatoriness amounts to is left to intuition. This paper identifies a crucial ambiguity in the notion of mandatoriness. Discussions of mandatory processes have run together notions of automaticity and ballisticity. Teasing apart these notions creates an important tool for the modularist's toolbox. Different putatively modular processes appear to differ in their kinds of mandatoriness. Separating out the automatic from the ballistic can help the modularist diagnose and explain away some putative counterexamples to multimodal and central modules, thereby helping us to better evaluate the evidentiary status of modularity theory
Keywords Modularity  Cognitive Penetration  Cognitive Architecture  Perceptual Processing  Psychological Kinds  Evolutionary Psychology  Cheater Detection  Automaticity  Linguistic Processing  Vision Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2014.950217
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Contents of Visual Experience.Susanna Siegel - 2010 - Oxford University Press USA.
Modularity in Cognition: Framing the Debate.H. Clark Barrett & Robert Kurzban - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):628-647.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Seeing and Conceptualizing: Modularity and the Shallow Contents of Perception.Eric Mandelbaum - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (2):267-283.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Precis of the Modularity of Mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):1-42.
Remarks on the Modularity of Mind.Benny Shanon - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (September):331-52.
Is Alignment Always the Result of Automatic Priming?Robert M. Krauss & Jennifer S. Pardo - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):203-204.
Who is the Controller of Controlled Processes?Daniel M. Wegner - 2005 - In Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.), The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. pp. 19-36.
Diversity and Unity of Modularity.Bongrae Seok - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (2):347-380.
On the Input Problem for Massive Modularity.John M. Collins - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (1):1-22.
Beyond Inference in Perception.Stephen P. Stich - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:553 - 560.
Cognitive Modularity, Biological Modularity and Evolvability.Claudia Lorena García - 2007 - Biological Theory: Integrating Development, Evolution and Cognition (KLI) 2 (1):62-73.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-11-06

Total downloads
292 ( #15,205 of 2,296,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #24,037 of 2,296,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature