Two routes to narrow content: Both dead ends

Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):3-22 (1993)

Authors
Pat Manfredi
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale
Abstract
If psychology requires a taxonomy that categorizes mental states according to their causal powers, the common sense method of individuating mental states (a taxonomy by intentional content) is unacceptable because mental states can have different intentional content, but identical causal powers. This difference threatens both the vindication of belief/desire psychology and the viability of scientific theories whose posits include intentional states. To resolve this conflict, Fodor has proposed that for scientific purposes mental states should be classified by their narrow content. Such a classification is supposed to correspond to a classification by causal powers. Yet a state's narrow content is also supposed to determine its (broad) intentional content whenever that state is 'anchored' to a context. I examine the two most plausible accounts of narrow content implicit in Fodor's work, arguing that neither account can accomplish both goals
Keywords Belief  Causality  Mental States  Metaphysics  Psychology  Science  Fodor, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089308573074
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,694
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Individualism and Psychology.Tyler Burge - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (January):3-45.
Special Sciences.Jerry A. Fodor - 1974 - Synthese 28 (2):97-115.
A Modal Argument for Narrow Content.Jerry A. Fodor - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):5-26.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fodor, Adams, and Causal Properties.L. M. Russow - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):57-61.
Narrow Content.Robert Stalnaker - 1990 - In C. Anthony Anderson & Joseph Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: Csli.
Content, Illusion, Partition.York H. Gunther - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (2):185-202.
Content, Causation, and Cognitive Science.David Braun - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (4):375-89.
Fodor's Modal Argument.Frederick R. Adams - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):41-56.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
20 ( #358,611 of 2,317,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #414,630 of 2,317,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature