Parmenides and Melissus employ different deductive styles for their different kinds of argumentation. The former’s poem flows in an interesting sequence of passages: contents foreword, methodological premises, krisis, conclusions and corollaries. The latter, however, organizes an extensive process of deduction to show the characteristics of what is. In both cases, the strength of their argument rests on their deductive form, on the syntactical level of their texts: the formal structure of their reasonings help to identify the features and logical intersections of their thoughts. On the one hand, Parmenides uses modal reasoning, enforcing the employment of the principle of the excluded middle. On the other hand, Melissus radicalizes the use of modal reasoning and employs counterfactual statements in order to develop his doctrine of what is. Despite their differences, both deserve a place in the Stone Age of logic and theory of argumentation due to their common ambition to demonstrate what is.
Keywords Melissus  Parmenides  argumentation  counterfactual reasoning  demonstration
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.14195/1984-249x_30_4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,719
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Counterfactuals.David K. Lewis - 1973 - Blackwell.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals.Jonathan Bennett - 2003 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (2):379-380.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Melissus as a Critic of Parmenides: A Mimetic Rivalry.Massimo Pulpito - 2018 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 22.
Melissus, Time and Eternity.Massimo Pulpito - 2017 - Peitho 8 (1):107-124.
Melissus of Samos: A Commentary on the Sources and Fragments.Brian Leon Merrill - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Formal Aspects of Legal Reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Melissus and Eleatic Monism.Benjamin Harriman - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
Counterfactual Reasoning.Roberta Ferrario - 2001 - In P. Bouquet V. Akman (ed.), Modeling and Using Context. Springer. pp. 170--183.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,042,429 of 2,349,702 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #120,527 of 2,349,702 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes