Abstract
In this paper, I contend that evidence-focused strategies of science communication may be complemented by possibly more effective rhetorical arguments in current public debates on vaccines. I analyse the case of direct science communication - that is, communication of evidence - and show that it is difficult to effectively communicate evidential standards of science in the presence of well-equipped anti-science movements. Instead, I argue that effective rhetorical tools involve ad hominem strategies, that is, arguments involving claims of expertise. I provide a rationale, and sketch a methodology, for using ad hominem arguments in science communication.
Keywords Ad hominem arguments  argumentation in science  expertise  science communication  scientific rhetoric  vaccine controversies
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.2478/slgr-2018-0033
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Rethinking Expertise.H. M. Collins & Robert Evans - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority.Douglas Neil Walton - 1997 - University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Genuine versus bogus scientific controversies: the case of statins.Carlo Martini & Mattia Andreoletti - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (4):1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ad Hominem Arguments.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University Alabama Press.
Rhetoric, Technical Writing, and Ethics.Michael Davis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478.
Lightening Up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
Equivocating the Ad Hominem.Daniel Putman - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):551-555.
Reconsidering the Ad Hominem.Christopher M. Johnson - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (2):251-266.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-07

Total views
34 ( #321,090 of 2,454,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,373 of 2,454,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes