Religious Studies 48 (4):497 - 514 (2012)

Authors
Luke Maring
Northern Arizona University
Abstract
The traditional problem of evil sets theists the task of reconciling two things: God and evil. I argue that theists face the more difficult task of reconciling God and evils that God is specially obligated to prevent. Because of His authority, God's obligation to curtail evil goes far beyond our Samaritan duty to prevent evil when doing so isn't overly hard. Authorities owe their subjects a positive obligation to prevent certain evils; we have a right against our authorities that they protect us. God's apparent mistake is not merely the impersonal wrong of failing to do enough good — though it is that too. It is the highly personal wrong of failing to live up to a moral requirement that comes bundled with authority over persons. To make my argument, I use the resources of political philosophy and defend a novel change to the orthodox account of authority
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0034412511000321
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Atheism and Dialetheism; or, ‘Why I Am Not a (Paraconsistent) Christian’.Zach Weber - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):401-407.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
244 ( #45,340 of 2,507,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,271 of 2,507,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes