Aquinas on Forms, Substances and Artifacts

Vivarium 54 (1):1-21 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

_ Source: _Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 1 - 21 Thomas Aquinas sees a sharp metaphysical distinction between artifacts and substances, but does not offer any explicit account of it. We argue that for Aquinas the contribution that an artisan makes to the generation of an artifact compromises the causal responsibility of the form of that artifact for what the artifact is; hence it compromises the metaphysical unity of the artifact to that of an accidental unity. By contrast, the metaphysical unity of a substance is achieved by a process of generation whereby the substantial form is solely responsible for what each part and the whole of a substance are. This, we submit, is where the metaphysical difference between artifacts and substances lies for Aquinas. Here we offer on behalf of Aquinas a novel account of the causal process of generation of substances, in terms of _descending forms_, and we bring out its explanatory merits by contrasting it to other existing accounts in the literature.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-31

Downloads
147 (#135,737)

6 months
22 (#163,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ben Page
Pembroke College, University of Oxford
Anna Marmodoro
Durham University

References found in this work

Substance and Artifact in Thomas Aquinas.Michael Rota - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (3):241 - 259.

Add more references