Hypatia 26 (1):132 - 149 (2011)
Catharine MacKinnon has pioneered a new brand of anti-pornography argument. In particular, MacKinnon claims that pornography silences women in a way that violates their right to free speech. In what follows, we focus on a certain account of silencing put forward by Jennifer Hornsby and Rae Langton, and we defend that account against two important objections. The first objection contends that this account makes a crucial but false assumption about the necessary role of hearer recognition in successful speech acts. In response, we argue that, as silencing primarily concerns communication, Hornsby and Langton are perfectly correct to treat hearer recognition as they do. The second objection contends that their particular account of silencing has the unacceptable result of undermining the responsibility of rapists. We here argue that no such result follows from their account
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts.John R. Searle - 1979 - Philosophical Review 91 (3):488-493.
Citations of this work BETA
On Silencing and Systematicity: The Challenge of the Drowning Case.Mary Kate McGowan, Ilana Walder‐Biesanz, Morvareed Rezaian & Chloe Emerson - 2016 - Hypatia 31 (1):74-90.
Similar books and articles
Saying and Doing: Speech Actions, Speech Acts and Related Events.Angela Grünberg - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):173-199.
Illocution, Silencing and the Act of Refusal.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):415-437.
On Pornography: Mackinnon, Speech Acts, and "False" Construction.Mary Kathryn McGowan - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (3):22-49.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads47 ( #110,804 of 2,169,144 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,285 of 2,169,144 )
How can I increase my downloads?