A reconstruction of Aristotle's modal syllogistic

History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):95-141 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ever since ?ukasiewicz, it has been opinio communis that Aristotle's modal syllogistic is incomprehensible due to its many faults and inconsistencies, and that there is no hope of finding a single consistent formal model for it. The aim of this paper is to disprove these claims by giving such a model. My main points shall be, first, that Aristotle's syllogistic is a pure term logic that does not recognize an extra syntactic category of individual symbols besides syllogistic terms and, second, that Aristotelian modalities are to be understood as certain relations between terms as described in the theory of the predicables developed in the Topics. Semantics for modal syllogistic is to be based on Aristotelian genus-species trees. The reason that attempts at consistently reconstructing modal syllogistic have failed up to now lies not in the modal syllogistic itself, but in the inappropriate application of modern modal logic and extensional set theory to the modal syllogistic. After formalizing the underlying predicable-based semantics (Section 1) and having defined the syllogistic propositions by means of its term logical relations (Section 2), this paper will set out to demonstrate in detail that this reconstruction yields all claims on validity, invalidity and inconclusiveness that Aristotle maintains in the modal syllogistic (Section 3 and 4)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
78 (#194,774)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marko Malink
New York University

Citations of this work

Avicennian essentialism.Fedor Benevich - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (3):410-433.
Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Heterodox dictum de omni et de nullo.Luca Gili - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (2):114-128.
The man without properties.Boris Hennig - 2017 - Synthese 194 (6).
Logical Consequence in Avicenna’s Theory.Saloua Chatti - 2019 - Logica Universalis 13 (1):101-133.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Edited by Martha Kneale.
The development of logic.W. C. Kneale - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Martha Kneale.
The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Studia Logica 15:308-310.
Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1949 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.

View all 32 references / Add more references