A search for the physical content of luders' rule

Synthese 82 (1):97 - 125 (1990)
Abstract
An interpretation of quantum mechanics that rejects hidden variables has to say something about the way measurement can be understood as a transformation on states of individual systems, and that leads to the core of the interpretive problems posed by Luders' projection rule: What, if any, is its physical content? In this paper I explore one suggestion which is implicit in usual interpretations of the rule and show that this view does not stand on solid ground. In the process, important aspects of the role played by the projection postulate in the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics will be clarified. It will be shown in particular that serious objections can be raised against the (often implicit) view that identifies the physical relation of compatibility preserved by Luders' rule with the relation of simultaneous measurability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00413671
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,651
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.John von Neumann & R. T. Beyer - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (32):343-347.
The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):161-175.
The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation.Paul Teller - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Relational Quantum Mechanics.Federico Laudisa - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Projection Postulate as a Fortuitous Approximation.Paul Teller - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.
Is There Really No Projection Postulate in the Modal Interpretation?W. Michael Dickson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):197-218.
A Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Mario Castagnino - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (2):380-443.
Minimal Disturbance in Quantum Logic.Sergio Martinez - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:83 - 88.
Quantum Logic and the Projection Postulate.Geoffrey Hellman - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
Quantum Logic and the Luders Rule.Allen Stairs - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):422-436.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

69 ( #72,367 of 2,143,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #25,396 of 2,143,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums