Beyond the Building Blocks Model

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):139-140 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a commentary on Carey (2009) The Origin of Concepts. Carey rightly rejects the building blocks model of concept acquisition on the grounds that new primitive concepts can be learned via the process of bootstrapping. But new primitives can be learned by other acquisition processes that do not involve bootstrapping, and bootstrapping itself is not a unitary process. Nonetheless, the processes associated with bootstrapping provide important insights into conceptual change.

Similar books and articles

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
O pochodzeniu pojęć.Joanna Komorowska-Mach - 2011 - Filozofia Nauki 19 (4).
Conceptual change.Paul Thagard - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
Toward a defensible bootstrapping.Sam Mitchell - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (2):241-260.
Concepts and conceptual change.Paul R. Thagard - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):255-74.
Acquiring a new concept is not explicable-by-content.Nicholas Shea - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):148 - 149.
Bootstrapping in Un-Natural Sciences: Archaeological Theory Testing.Alison Wylie - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:314 - 321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-06

Downloads
325 (#59,130)

6 months
78 (#53,450)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eric Margolis
University of British Columbia
Stephen Laurence
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Can Bootstrapping Explain Concept Learning?Jacob Beck - 2017 - Cognition 158 (C):110–121.

Add more citations