Criticising Humanities Today:-Framing Debates on the Value of Humanities in EU Higher Education Policy with a Special Focus on the Bologna Process
Dissertation, Uppsala University (2014)
AbstractThe main research question that this paper aims to answer is: ‘In what does today’s attack on humanities consist and how can humanities be defended?’ In order to answer this research question, one needs first to describe how the humanities have argued for their usefulness before the Bologna Process; second, provide reasons for the claim that the Bologna Process would be a new type of attack; and third, analyse the new defences for the humanities, so as to discuss whether these are suitable. The main finding of this study was to show that, before deciding what type of education society needs, we need to understand who we are educating through our universities. Taking a stance on “who should we educate?” is prior to being able to judge educational policies. This decision requires a previous justification that requires arguments taken from the field of social justice: Who needs to be educated and who has the right to be educated? Furthermore, we have seen that all answers we have examined to the question underlying educational policies, i.e. ‘who is being educated?’, were linked at some level with the citizenship issue. By defining who is a full citizen, an answer to the question who had the right to a humanistic education was implicitly answered. Nussbaum’s project to universalise the definition of democratic citizenship would ensure a basis for providing humanistic education for all. Such a line of arguing would provide humanities to the well-regarded status they had starting from the Renaissance times, but this time not as a device for exclusion, but inclusion for all. We have tried to show that, by defending the humanities, one defends the idea of a plurality of educational purposes, the right to build one’s life based on an education that is not submitted to the political goals of the day, ultimately the right to have a dissenting voice and a different perspective on life. By defending humanities, one defends the true ‘usefulness’ of education, namely its potential for constructing democratic citizenship for all.
Similar books and articles
Changing Subjects of Education in the Bologna Process.Lavinia Marin - 2015 - In Council for European Studies’ Twenty - Second International Conference of Europeanists on “Contradictions: Envisioning European Futures ”. Paris:
Understanding the Humanities Crisis: An Argument for Humanities’ National Value.Nikolai Viedge - 2016 - South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):54-69.
The Digital Humanities as a Humanities Project.Patrik Svensson - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (1-2):425-60.
Knowledge of Being V. Practice of Becoming in Higher Education: Overcoming the Dichotomy in the Humanities.Ivan Marquez - 2006 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5 (2):147-161.
Academic Specialization and Contemporary University Humanities Centers.Martine W. Brownley - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (3):224-237.
Innovation and Entrepreneurialism in the University =.Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) - 2006 - Edipucrs.
The Humanities: Plain and Simple.Robert Garland - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (3):300-312.
Praxis and Pedagogy as Related to the Arts and Humanities.D. G. Mulcahy - 2010 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9 (3):305-321.
Future Priorities of the Humanities in Europe: What Have the Humanities to Offer?: Report of a Round Table Conference Held to Draft a Manifesto for the European Commissioner and Working Papers for the EC Working Party on Future Priorities for Humanities Research.Jan Parker - 2007 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 6 (1):123-127.
European Citizens Under Construction: The Bologna Process Analysed From a Governmentality Perspective.Andreas Fejes - 2008 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (4):515-530.
The European Union Higher Education Policy and the Stake of Regionalization.Nikos Papadakis & Theofano Tsakanika - 2006 - The European Legacy 11 (3):289-297.
‘ Making A World That Is Worth Living In’: Humanities Teaching And The Formation Of Practical Reasoning.Melanie Walker - 2009 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8 (3):231-246.
Open Technologies and Resources for the Humanities – and Cooperative Consequences.Saul Fisher - 2006 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 5 (2):127-145.
Humanities in Medical Education: Some Contributions.K. Danner Clouser - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (3):289-301.
What Are You Going to Do with a Degree in That?: Arguing for the Humanities in an Era of Efficiency.Eliza F. Kent - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (3):273-284.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Schiță pentru o posibilă filosofie a digitalului.Lavinia Marin - 2016 - Revista de Filosofie (Romania) 63 (5):571-582.
In Support of Disciplinarity in Teaching Sociology: Reflections From Ireland.Amanda Haynes - 2017 - Teaching Sociology 45 (1):54-64.
References found in this work
The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of its Pupils.Jacques Derrida - 1983 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 10 (1):5-29.
The Principle of Reason: The University in the Eyes of Its Pupils.Jacques Derrida, Catherine Porter & Edward P. Morris - 1983 - Diacritics 13 (3):2.
Episteme and Techne [Electronic Version].R. Perry - 2007 - In Thaddeus Metz (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.