Whilst Hegel's influence upon the Frankfurt School's reconstruction of Marx has not gone unnoticed, this influence has never really been adequately theorised. In particular, the question of how the Frankfurt School understood the relation between Hegel's method and Marx's materialism has received very little systematic attention. The present study is a response to this situation: it presents the Frankfurt Marxist tradition as a significant although by no means uncritical contribution to the theory of historical materialism. Moreover, that contribution is shown to derive from some of the central concepts of Hegel's philosophy. Thus in opposition to those commentators, Marxists and non-Marxists alike, who have tended to view Frankfurt Marxism as an exercise in eclectic revisionism, I argue that the work of Horkheimer and his colleagues constitutes an attempt to restate and defend, on the basis of an immanent critique of Hegel's idealism, the fundamental principles of Marx's historical materialism. Accordingly, the central chapters of this thesis are devoted to a close examination of the way in which members of the Frankfurt School, building on the work of Lukács and Korsch, sought to appropriate Hegel's subject-object dialectic on behalf of materialism. In the course of this investigation the following themes come to prominence: the relation between Hegel's social philosophy and a critical theory of society; Horkheimer's project of multi-disciplinary materialism; the methodological significance of the category of totality; materialism as the preponderance of the object; the possibility and nature of a Freud-Marx synthesis; the concept of a critical as opposed to a traditional scientific theory of society. Taken together these themes constitute the basic problematic of the Frankfurt Marxist tradition. The intention of this study is to demonstrate the importance of that problematic for the further development of the materialist theory of history and society
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School.John Abromeit - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
On Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory: A Critical Appreciation of Herbert Marcuse's Reason and Revolution, Fifty Years Later.Kevin Anderson - 1993 - Sociological Theory 11 (3):243-267.
Reason, Tradition, and the Good: Macintyre's Tradition-Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory.Jeffery Nicholas - 2012 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Marx and the Origin of Dialectical Materialism1.Stanley Moore - 1971 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):420-429.
Marxism and Materialism: A Study in Marxist Theory of Knowledge.David-Hillel Ruben - 1979 - Humanities Press.
Political Theory, Critical Theory, and the Place of the Frankfurt School.Dick Howard - 2000 - Critical Horizons 1 (2):271-280.
Marxism and the Dialectical Method: A Critique of G.A. Cohen.Sean Sayers - 1984 - Radical Philosophy 36 (36):4-13.
Evolving Negativity: From Hegel to Derrida.Nina Belmonte - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):18-58.
Revisiting the Dialectic of Environment: Nature as Ideology and Ethics in Adorno and the Frankfurt School.Eric S. Nelson - 2011 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2011 (155):105-126.
Negativity and Dialectical Materialism: Zhang Shiying's Reading of Hegel's Dialectical Logic.Peter Button - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (1):63-82.
The Dunayevskaya-Marcuse-Fromm Correspondence, 1954-1978: Dialogues on Hegel, Marx, and Critical Theory.Kevin Anderson & Russell Rockwell (eds.) - 2012 - Lexington Books.
Added to index2011-09-02
Total downloads14 ( #336,722 of 2,177,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?