Descartes [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 41 (2):380-381 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cottingham aims to present Descartes' philosophy in a way that makes "the issues reasonably accessible to students who may be approaching the Cartesian system for the first time". He also aims to do "justice to the complexities of argument involved". There is a potential conflict here: making the issues accessible can lead one to oversimplify them; capturing the complexities of Descartes' thought can cause one to leave inexperienced readers behind. When the conflict arises, Cottingham routinely picks accessibility over philosophical complexity. As a result, his book is not as philosophically sophisticated as other commentaries, such as E. M. Curley's, Margaret Wilson's and Bernard Williams's, but it is a superb introduction to Descartes' philosophy for the uninitiated. Cottingham places Descartes' philosophical ideas within the context of the intellectual climate of his time and shows the interrelations between major elements of Descartes' system, from his epistemology to his view of the physical universe to his physiological and psychological theories. The book's only drawback as an introduction is its limited bibliography. Many who read this book will be inspired to learn more; a more extensive, perhaps topically organized, bibliography would have helped them get started.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes among the Scholastics.Roger Ariew - 2011 - Boston: Brill. Edited by Roger Ariew.
Descartes's gambit.Peter J. Markie - 1986 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Descartes's theory of judgment.Peter Markie - 1983 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (S1):101-110.
Descartes's Theory of Judgment.Peter Markie - 1983 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (S1):101-110.
Almog's Descartes.Fred Ablondi - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (3):423-431.
The Cartesian Circle and Two Forms of Scepticism.Ruth Weintraub - 1997 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (4):365 - 377.
Never Let the Passions Be Your Guide: Descartes and the Role of the Passions.Shoshana Brassfield - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (3):459-477.
Descartes and the tree of knowledge.Roger Ariew - 1992 - Synthese 92 (1):101 - 116.
Essays on Descartes.Paul Hoffman - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
47 (#323,378)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Markie
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

Certainty.Baron Reed - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
How to Undercut Radical Skepticism.Santiago Echeverri - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (5):1299-1321.
Substance and Independence in Descartes.Anat Schechtman - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (2):155-204.
Scientia, diachronic certainty, and virtue.Saja Parvizian - 2021 - Synthese 198 (10):9165-9192.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references