Digging beneath rules and similarity

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):29-30 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pothos suggests dispensing with the distinction between rules and similarity, without defining what is meant by either term. We agree that there are problems with the distinction between rules and similarity, but believe these will be solved only by exploring the representations and processes underlying cases purported to involve rules and similarity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,330

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The rules versus similarity distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
In search of radical similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Rules and similarity – a false dichotomy.James A. Hampton - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):26-26.
Is this what the debate on rules was about?Ulrike Hahn - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):25-26.
Rules, similarity, and threshold logic.Włodzisław Duch - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):23-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#216,525)

6 months
2 (#638,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references