- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce? by David Benatar and David Wasserman: New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. vi + 269, $US24.95 [Book Review]
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2):413-413 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
DOI
10.1080/00048402.2016.1196226
My notes
Similar books and articles
Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce? By David Benatar and David Wasserman.Allen Thompson - forthcoming - Analysis:anw055.
Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce?David Benatar & David Wasserman (eds.) - 2015 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce? By David Benatar and David Wasserman.Raymond Dennehy - 2016 - International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2):253-256.
Debating Procreation: Is it Wrong to Reproduce?, by David Benatar and David Wasserman. [REVIEW]Nancy J. Matchett - 2016 - Teaching Philosophy 39 (2):243-247.
David Benatar and David Wasserman, Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Reproduce? [REVIEW]Erik Magnusson - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (4):894-900.
Debating Procreation: Is it wrong to reproduce? [REVIEW]Lorraine Yeung - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268):663-666.
Is Having Children Always Wrong?Rivka Weinberg - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):26-37.
Debating brain drain: May governments restrict emigration? Gillian Brock and Michael Blake new York: Oxford university press, 2015; 304 pp.; 24.95. [REVIEW]Gary James Jason - 2017 - Dialogue 56 (1):196-198.
Debating Procreation: Is it Wrong to Reproduce. [REVIEW]Asha Lancaster-Thomas - 2017 - Metapsychology Online Reviews 21.
Liao, S. Matthew. The Right to Be Loved.New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp. 272. $45.00.David Archard - 2016 - Ethics 127 (1):294-298.
Book review: Janet L. Dolgin. Families: Law, gender and difference and defining the family: Law, technology, and reproduction in an uneasy age. By new York: New York university press, 1997. And David M. Estlund and Martha C. Nussbaum. Sex, preference, and family: Essays in law and nature. New York: Oxford university press, 1997. [REVIEW]David M. Adams - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):254-256.
Furthering the Case for Anti-natalism: Seana Shiffrin and the Limits of Permissible Harm.Asheel Singh - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):104-116.
The Scientific Revolution: Five Books about ItSteven Weinberg. To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science. xiv + 417 pp., illus., bibl., index. New York: HarperCollins, 2015. $28.99 .David Knight. Voyaging in Strange Seas: The Great Revolution in Science. viii + 329 pp., figs., index. New Haven, Conn./London: Yale University Press, 2014. $35 .William E. Burns. The Scientific Revolution in Global Perspective. xv + 198 pp., illus., figs., tables, bibl., index. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. £16.99 .David Wootton. The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution. xiv + 769 pp., illus., figs., bibl., index. London: Penguin Books, Allen Lane, 2015. £20.40 .H. Floris Cohen. The Rise of Modern Science Explained: A Comparative History. vi + 296 pp., figs., tables, index. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. $89.99. [REVIEW]John Henry - 2016 - Isis 107 (4):809-817.
Book review: Janet L. Dolgin. Families: Law, gender and difference and defining the family: Law, technology, and reproduction in an uneasy age. By new York: New York university press, 1997. And David M. Estlund and Martha C. Nussbaum. Sex, preference, and family: Essays in law and nature. New York: Oxford university press, 1997. [REVIEW]David M. Adams - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (3):254-256.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-07-18
Downloads
53 (#227,781)
6 months
1 (#481,005)
2016-07-18
Downloads
53 (#227,781)
6 months
1 (#481,005)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ffd8f9497-mnh4c N