Roberto De Andrade Martins
Universidade de São Paulo
Isometry hypotheses are propositions that assert the constancy of a specific physical magnitude of a system under prescribed conditions. This paper addresses the controversy concerning the conventionality of this type of hypotheses. It discusses several instances of isometry hypotheses and it is shown that experimental facts can be invoked to criticise (or "refute") isometry hypotheses, just as other types of hypotheses. This proves that isometry hypotheses, and the choices of measurement standards that are grounded in such hypotheses, are not merely conventional.
Keywords measurement  isometry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/33.3.296
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Experimental Tests of Isometry Hypotheses.Roberto A. Martindes - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):296-304.
Relevant Evidence.Clark Glymour - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (14):403-426.
Mathematical Proof and Experimental Proof. Copeland - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (4):303-.
Experimental Tests of the Sum Rule.M. L. G. Redhead - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):50-64.
Kant on Experiment.Alberto Vanzo - 2012 - In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor. Springer. pp. 75-96.
Experimental Tests of Rationality.Daniel Read - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prasanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #492,623 of 2,448,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,843 of 2,448,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes