Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):106-107 (1999)

Abstract
Although the working memory capacity involved in syntactic processing may be separate from the capacity involved in word list recall, other aspects of initial sentence interpretation appear to depend on some of the same capacities tapped by span tasks. Specifically, there appears to a capacity for lexical–semantic retention involved in both sentence comprehension and span measures.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99351785
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,159
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Working Memory and Sentence Comprehension: Whose Burden of Proof?Arthur Wingfield - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):113-114.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
23 ( #476,443 of 2,454,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,241 of 2,454,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes