Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341 (2004)
This paper sets out two semantics for the relevant logic R based on Dunn's four-valued semantics for first-degree entailments. Unlike Routley's semantics for weak relevant logics, they do not use two ternary accessibility relations. Unlike Restall's semantics, they capture all of R. But there is a catch. Both of the present semantics are neighbourhood semantics, that is, they include sets of propositions in the specification of their frames
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I.Alan R. Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1975 - Princeton University Press.
Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. II.Alan Ross Anderson, Nuel D. Belnap & J. Michael Dunn - 1992 - Princeton University Press.
Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and 'Coupled Trees'.J. Michael Dunn - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (3):149-168.
How a Computer Should Think.Nuel Belnap - 1977 - In G. Ryle (ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy. Oriel Press.
Citations of this work BETA
R and Relevance Principle Revisited.Eunsuk Yang - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):767-782.
Similar books and articles
On Permutation in Simplified Semantics.Greg Restall & Tony Roy - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):333 - 341.
Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.
A Relevant Theory of Conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.
Four-Valued Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals).Greg Restall - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (2):139 - 160.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #103,704 of 2,163,629 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,037 of 2,163,629 )
How can I increase my downloads?