God and Ultimate Origins Review [Book Review]
AbstractThe cosmological argument, while considered to be deductive by some of its propounders, is not considered fool-proof by others. However, given the fact that causality is intrinsic to our thinking, reasoning towards ultimate causality remains significant. Andrew Loke capitalizes on this in his recent book.
Similar books and articles
Review of God and Ultimate Origins. [REVIEW]Joshua Rasmussen - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (1):189-194.
Toward a new kalām cosmological argument.Benjamin Victor Waters - 2015 - Cogent Arts and Humanities 2 (1).
Review of Timothy O'Connor, Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).
Is an Uncaused Beginning of the Universe Possible?Andrew Loke - 2012 - Philosophia Christi 14 (2):387-407.
Craig, Mackie, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1991 - Religious Studies 27 (2):189 - 197.
Why there is Something rather than Nothing. [REVIEW]Bruce R. Reichenbach - 2006 - Faith and Philosophy 23 (1):107-111.
Kalam: A swift argument from origins to first cause?John Taylor - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):167-179.
Explanation and the Cosmological Argument.Bruce Reichenbach - 2004 - In Michael Peterson & Raymond vanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. London: Blackwell. pp. 97-114.
William Lane Craig: "The Kalam Cosmological Argument". [REVIEW]Bruce Reichenbach - 1981 - The Thomist 45 (2):338.
The Kalām Cosmological Argument, the Big Bang, and Atheism.John Park - 2016 - Acta Analytica 31 (3):323-335.
A Limited Defense of the Kalām Cosmological Argument.Spencer Case - 2017 - Res Philosophica 94 (1):165-175.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads