G. H. von Wright on Explanation and Understanding: An Appraisal

History and Theory 29 (2):205-233 (1990)

Abstract
Two jarring results concerning the main theses of Georg Henrik von Wright's Explanation and Understanding are reached through an examination and criticism of his project. It is shown, contrary to his settled judgment both in EU and subsequently, that the schema of practical inference is a causal principle, and that it is nomological in character. But one feature of von Wright's overall analysis holds up and continues to show promise: his idea of understanding explanation. This idea combines the EU account of the schema and its instantiation with the notion of an intelligible connection of these instantiating elements with one another. Here the schema is deployed in conjunction with the test of intelligible connection as one of its conditions of application. The schema, so deployed, is revisable on the basis of experiences that do not conform to what we expect them to be when they are regimented in accordance with the model of understanding explanation; thus, even though the schema is not a general law, we have a basis for characterizing it as nomological, nonetheless.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2505226
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,413
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Convergence of Ricoeur’s and Von Wright’s Complex Models of History.Linda L. Cox - 2014 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 5 (1):95-114.
The Problem of Other Cultures and Other Periods in Action Explanations.Rex Martin - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):345-366.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Explanation in Understanding.K. Khalifa - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):161-187.
Explaining Understanding (or Understanding Explanation).Wesley Van Camp - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):95-114.
Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding.J. D. Trout - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):212-233.
Von Wright on Historical Causation1.Elazar Weinryb - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):327-338.
No Understanding Without Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):510-515.
Unification, Explanation and Explaining Unity: The Fisher–Wright Controversy.Margaret Morrison - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):233-245.
Understanding, Knowledge, and Scientific Antirealism.Kareem Khalifa - 2011 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 83 (1):93-112.
More on Understanding in the Social Sciences.Frank Cunningham - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):321-326.
The Psychology of Scientific Explanation.J. D. Trout - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):564–591.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-02

Total views
13 ( #662,643 of 2,291,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #573,449 of 2,291,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature