Hope, fantasy, and commitment1 Adrienne M. Martin [email protected]
AbstractThe standard foil for recent theories of hope is the belief-desire analysis advocated by Hobbes, Day, Downie, and others. According to this analysis, to hope for S is no more and no less than to desire S while believing S is possible but not certain. Opponents of the belief-desire analysis argue that it fails to capture one or another distinctive feature or function of hope: that hope helps one resist the temptation to despair;2 that hope engages the sophisticated capacities of human agency, such as planning;3 or that hope involves the imagination in ways desire need not.4 Here, I focus on the role of imagination in hope, and discuss its implications for hope’s relation to practical commitment or end-setting.
Similar books and articles
Hopes and Dreams.Adrienne M. Martin - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (1):148 - 173.
Hope: The power of wish and possibility.Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2010 - Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.