Hume versus the vulgar on resistance, nisus, and the impression of power

Philosophical Studies 172 (2):305-319 (2015)

Authors
Colin Marshall
University of Washington
Abstract
In the first Enquiry, Hume takes the experience of exerting force against a solid body to be a key ingredient of the vulgar idea of power, so that the vulgar take that experience to provide us with an impression of power. Hume provides two arguments against the vulgar on this point: the first concerning our other applications of the idea of power and the second concerning whether that experience yields certainty about distinct events. I argue that, even if we accept Hume’s conception of the vulgar’s approach, neither of Hume’s arguments succeeds. The first argument can be resisted either by using the very arguments Hume provides concerning other causal representations or by simply rejecting Hume’s strict empiricism. The second argument can be resisted on epistemological grounds: there is no reason to think that an experience of a maximally-strong metaphysical connection would provide a maximally-strong epistemological connection. Unlike some recent neo-Anscombean responses to the second argument, my response does not require challenging Hume’s view that causal relations are strictly necessary. Though I do not attempt to translate the resilience of the vulgar view into contemporary terms, the failure of Hume’s arguments challenges one of the long-standing motivations for Humean approaches to causation.
Keywords Hume  resistance  causation  touch
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0304-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1997 - Philosophy 74 (287):130-134.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant on Impenetrability, Touch, and the Causal Content of Perception.Colin Marshall - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1411-1433.
Towards a Definition of Efforts.Olivier Massin - 2017 - Motivation Science 3 (3):230-259.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-17

Total views
211 ( #31,517 of 2,253,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #14,434 of 2,253,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature