In defense of representation

Cognitive Psychology 40 (2):138--171 (2000)

Authors
Eric Dietrich
State University of New York at Binghamton
Abstract
The computational paradigm, which has dominated psychology and artificial intelligence since the cognitive revolution, has been a source of intense debate. Recently, several cognitive scientists have argued against this paradigm, not by objecting to computation, but rather by objecting to the notion of representation. Our analysis of these objections reveals that it is not the notion of representation per se that is causing the problem, but rather specific properties of representations as they are used in various psychological theories. Our analysis suggests that all theorists accept the idea that cognitive processing involves internal information-carrying states that mediate cognitive processing. These mediating states are a superordinate category of representations. We discuss five properties that can be added to mediating states and examine their importance in various cognitive models. Finally, three methodological lessons are drawn from our analysis and discussion.
Keywords Representation  Cognitive Science  Artificical Intelligence  Philosophy of Mind  Cognitive Psychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Unified Theories of Cognition.Allen Newell - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Perceptual Symbol Systems.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):577-660.

View all 58 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Six Views of Embodied Cognition.Margaret Wilson - 2002 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (4):625--636.
Extending the Classical View of Representation.Arthur B. Markman & Eric Dietrich - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12):470-475.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dynamical Explanation and Mental Representations.Tony Chemero - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (4):141-142.
A Role for Representation in Cognitive Neurobiology.Jacqueline Anne Sullivan - 2010 - Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 77 (5):875-887.
Cognitive Models and Representation.Rebecca Kukla - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):219-32.
Mental Representation.David Pitt - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Why There Are No Mental Representations.M. Morris - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (1):1-30.
Dealing with Concepts: From Cognitive Psychology to Knowledge Representation.Marcello Frixione & Antonio Lieto - 2013 - Frontiers of Psychological and Behevioural Science 2 (3):96-106.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-27

Total views
437 ( #12,646 of 2,291,076 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #19,551 of 2,291,076 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature