In defense of one form of traditional epistemology

Philosophical Studies 85 (1):37-55 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peter J. Markie, Descartes' Gambit. [REVIEW]Steven Dehaven - 1987 - Philosophy in Review 7:252-255.
Descartes's Gambit. Peter J. Markie.Lynn Joy - 1987 - Isis 78 (2):259-260.
Response to Markie: Rights and relations. [REVIEW]B. C. Postow - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 40 (2):303 - 305.
Markie on dreams and deceivers.Carol J. White & Thomas C. Gillespie - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (2):287 - 295.
P. J. Markie: "Descarte's Gambit". [REVIEW]Stephen Gaukroger - 1988 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66:414.
A defense of propositional functionalism.Mark McEvoy - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:421-436.
Descartes' Gambit. [REVIEW]John Cottingham - 1987 - Review of Metaphysics 41 (2):401-402.
In defense of incompatibilism.Carl Ginet - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (November):391-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
59 (#357,618)

6 months
7 (#671,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Markie
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

Naturalizing Goldman.Paul A. Roth - 1999 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):89-111.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references