Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 319-320 (2009)
Kant's theoretical philosophy is often read as a response to skeptical challenges raised by his predecessors. Yet Kant himself explicitly discusses skepticism in relatively few places in his published work, so Michael Forster's focused examination of Kant's relation to skepticism is a useful addition to the literature. Forster sets out to distinguish different types of skepticism to which Kant might be responding, determine what responses Kant offers, and evaluate the strength of those responses.Perhaps the most valuable part of the book is the opening chapters, where Forster distinguishes three kinds of skepticism about metaphysics , and argues that it is a mistake to see Cartesian, veil of perception skepticism as a central target of Kant's. Though this point has been made before , insufficient attention to it has continued to result in misplaced criticisms of Kant's project, and Forster's forceful reminder is certainly welcome.The other two types of skepticism, Forster argues, did play crucial roles in the development of Kant's metaphysical views, with each at some point rousing Kant from a self-described "dogmatic slumber." Forster claims that the 1766
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Aristotelian Prescription: Skepticism, Retortion, and Transcendental Arguments.Adrian Bardon - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):263-276.
Review of M. Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW]Diego E. Machuca - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (3):186-8.
Kant's Response to Skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.
The Politics of Skepticism in the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume, and Kant.John Christian Laursen - 1992 - E.J. Brill.
Three Skeptics and the Critique: Review of Michael Forster's Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW]Andrew Chignell & Colin McLear - 2010 - Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244.
On the Practical Foundation of Kant's Response to Epistemic Skepticism.Abraham Anderson - 1998 - Kant-Studien 89 (2):145-166.
Added to index2009-04-11
Total downloads34 ( #151,070 of 2,168,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?