Leslie Smith on Indoctrination

Journal of Moral Education 4 (2):117-120 (1975)
Abstract
Abstract: Leslie Smith has examined and found wanting the Method Thesis, the Content Thesis and the Intention Thesis for accounting for indoctrination. While his conclusions seem correct, his arguments in support of them are found wanting. It is also argued that the Evaluation Thesis Smith comes down in favour of is open to those criticisms he himself levelled at the Intention Thesis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0305724750040205
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Indoctrination and Intent.Leslie Smith - 1974 - Journal of Moral Education 3 (3):229-233.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

5 ( #582,975 of 2,146,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,104 of 2,146,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums