Mental capacity and the applied phenomenology of judgement

Abstract

We undertake to bring a phenomenological perspective to bear on a challenge of contemporary law and clinical practice. In a wide variety of contexts, legal and medical professionals are called upon to assess the competence or capacity of an individual to exercise her own judgement in making a decision for herself. We focus on decisions regarding consent to or refusal of medical treatment and contrast a widely recognised clinical instrument, the MacCAT-T, with a more phenomenologically informed approach. While the MacCAT-T focuses attention on individual cognitive performance criteria, an approach oriented by second-person phenomenology brings into view the complex role of time, others and identity in constituting the capacity for individual autonomous judgement. Our phenomenological analysis has consequences both for the practice of capacity assessments and for further research in this arena. Good practice in capacity assessment must attend to decision communities, distributed capacity, and temporal competence, while research on mental capacity will miss the phenomenon if it trains its focus ‘between the ears.’ We illustrate our approach by considering two recent cases of contested capacity: one involving cognitive disability in a dysfunctional decision community, the second presenting the possibility of competent decision-making under conditions of paranoid schizophrenia

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-29

Downloads
153 (#78,823)

6 months
2 (#259,476)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Meaning of 'Meaning'.Hillary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Totality and Infinity.Emmanuel Levinas - 1961/1969 - Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Consciousness Explained.William G. Lycan - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (3):424.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Capacity, Mental Mechanisms, and Unwise Decisions.Tim Thornton - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):127-132.
Clarifying Capacity: Reasons and Value.Jules Holroyd - forthcoming - In Lubomira Radoilska (ed.), Autonomy and Mental Health. Oxford University Press.
Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.Peter Lucas - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.
The Pragmatic Aspects of Assessing Mental Capacity.Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):133-134.
Faulty Judgment, Expert Opinion, and Decision-Making Capacity.Michel Silberfeld & David Checkland - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4):377-393.
Mental Competence or Best Interests?Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):151-152.
Running Before We Can Walk: Do We Have the Capacity?Toby Williamson - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):147-150.
What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed?Nelson Cowan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
The Paradox of the Assessment of Capacity Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.Ajit Shah - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):111-115.
A Temporal Account of the Limited Processing Capacity.Simon Grondin - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):122-123.