Moral Coherence and Principle Pluralism

Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (6):727-749 (2014)

Abstract

This paper develops and defends a conception of moral coherence that is suitable for use in contexts of principle pluralism. I argue that, as they are traditionally understood, coherence methods stack the deck against pluralist theories, by incorporating norms such as systematicity—that the principles of a theory should be as few and as simple as possible. I develop and defend an alternative, minimal, conception of coherence that focuses instead on consistency. It has been suggested that consistency in this context should aim at the avoidance of conflict, but I argue against this: what matters is “case consistency,” or judging consistently from one case to another. This means judging in accordance with morally relevant similarities and differences. I defend my proposal of minimal coherence from objections having to do with complexity and arbitrariness

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
50 (#230,719)

6 months
4 (#162,893)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patricia Marino
University of Waterloo

References found in this work

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Why Abortion is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
The Additive Fallacy.Shelly Kagan - 1988 - Ethics 99 (1):5-31.
Why Abortion Is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Coherence and Value Pluralism.Patricia Marino - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):117-135.
Principlism and Moral Dilemmas: A New Principle.J. P. DeMarco - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):101-105.
Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts?Bernward Gesang - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.
Chisholm and Coherence.Richard Foley - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (1):53 - 63.
Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.
Minimal, Moderate, and Extreme Moral Pluralism.Peter S. Wenz - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):61-74.
On the Truth-Conduciveness of Coherence.William Roche - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):647-665.
Pluralism, the Ethical Matrix, and Coming to Conclusions.Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):455-468.