Measurement 42 (2):241-253 (2009)
Measurement in soft systems generally cannot exploit physical sensors as data acquisition devices. The emphasis in this case is instead on how to choose the appropriate indicators and to combine their values so to obtain an overall result, interpreted as the value of a property, i.e., the measurand, for the system under analysis. This paper aims at discussing the epistemological conditions of the claim that such a process is a measurement, and performance evaluation is the case introduced to support the analysis, performed in systematic comparison with the paradigm of measurement of physical quantities. Some background questions arising here are: – Are the chosen indicators appropriate performance indicators? – Do such indicators convey complete and non-redundant information on performance? – Does the chosen combination rule generate results suitably interpretable as performance values? And enlarging the focus: – Does the obtained value specifically convey information on the system under analysis, instead of some different entity (typically including the subject who is evaluating)? Operatively: would different subjects evaluate the same system in the same way? i.e., is the obtained information objective? – Does the obtained value convey information that is interpretable in the same way by different subjects? Operatively: would different subjects who have agreed on a decision procedure make the same decision from the same performance information? i.e., is the obtained information intersubjective? Any well founded positive answers to these questions significantly support a structural interpretation of measurement encompassing both physical and soft measurement.
|Keywords||Foundations of measurement Measurement in soft systems Models in measurement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Measurement, Models, and Uncertainty.Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari - 2012 - IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 61 (8):2144 - 2152.
Measurement and Instrumentation Science. An Analytical Review.Ludwik Finkelstein - 1994 - Measurement 14 (1):3-14.
Beyond the Representational Viewpoint: A New Formalization of Measurement.Luca Mari - 2000 - Measurement 27 (2):71-84.
Outline of a General Model of Measurement.Aldo Frigerio, Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):123-149.
Widely, Strongly and Weakly Defined Measurement.Ludwik Finkelstein - 2003 - Measurement 34 (1):39-48.
A Relational Theory of Measurement: Traceability as a Solution to the Non-Transitivity of Measurement Results.Luca Mari & Sergio Sartori - 2007 - Measurement 40 (2):233-242.
Widely-Defined Measurement. An Analysis of Challenges.Ludwik Finkelstein - 2009 - Measurement 42 (9):1270–1277.
The Analytic Versus Representational Theory of Measurement: A Philosophy of Science Perspective.Zoltan Domotor & Vadim Batitsky - 2008 - Measurement Science Review 8 (6):129-146.
A Review of the Fundamental Concepts of Measurement. [REVIEW]Ludwik Finkelstein - 1984 - Measurement 2 (1):25-34.
Quantum and Classical Correlations in Quantum Measurement.Zhengjun Xi & Yongming Li - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (3):285-293.
Added to index2011-12-14
Total downloads11 ( #404,743 of 2,172,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?