Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 33 (3):481-497 (2011)

Tomas Marvan
Czech Academy of Sciences
Studie recenzuje díla: Sam HARRIS, The Moral Landscape a Patricia Smith CHURCHLAND, Braintrust. Cílem recenzní stati je vyzdvihnout hlubokou shodu v naturalistickém pojetí etiky u obou autorů a upozornit na některé nedostatky jejich argumentace.
Keywords morálka   etický naturalismus   neuroetika   věda   Harris   Smith Churchland
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Prajñākaragupta on the Two Truths and Argumentation.Hisayasu Kobayashi - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):427-439.
The Rig Veda and Atharva Veda.Edward V. Arnold - 1901 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 22:309-320.
Heat in the Rig Veda and Atharva Veda.H. D. Velankar & C. J. Blair - 1962 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 82 (3):431.
Śleṣa in the Ṛg Veda?: Poetic Effects in Ṛg Veda X.29.1.Stephanie W. Jamison - 2015 - International Journal of Hindu Studies 19 (1-2):157-170.
Věda Jako Morální Volba. [REVIEW]Libor Benda - 2017 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 39 (1):120-129.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #241,418 of 2,445,466 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #67,511 of 2,445,466 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes