Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):437 - 442 (1974)
In this paper a recent argument by jan narveson against pacifism is evaluated. It is shown that narveson fails to refute pacifism as he has defined it; it is also shown that even if narveson's argument is sound, It fails to refute what might be called "antiwar pacifism," the view that war is morally wrong
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Pacifism in the English Renaissance, 1497-1530.Robert Pardee Adams - 1937 - Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Theological Contexts of Just War Theory and Pacifism: A Response to J. Bryan Hehir.Lisa Sowle Cahill - 1992 - Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):259 - 265.
I. On the Alleged Inconsistency, Moral Insensitivity and Fanaticism of Pacifism.Richard Routley - 1984 - Inquiry 27 (1-4):117 – 136.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #99,817 of 2,163,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,236 of 2,163,617 )
How can I increase my downloads?