Opposites detract: Why rules and similarity should not be viewed as opposite ends of a continuum

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29 (2005)
Abstract
Criteria that aim to dichotomize cognition into rules and similarity are destined to fail because rules and similarity are not in genuine conflict. It is possible for a given cognitive domain to exploit rules without similarity, similarity without rules, or both (rules and similarity) at the same time.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X05380010
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,530
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
33 ( #166,164 of 2,210,880 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #71,785 of 2,210,880 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature