Cambridge Scholars Press (2012)
AbstractThe modern world was in part born as a reaction against Aristotelianism. However, the image of Aristotle to which modern philosophers reacted was partial, to say the least. Paradoxical though it may seem, today, more than twenty-three centuries on, we may now be in the most advantageous position for understanding the Stagirite's philosophy and applying it to contemporary problems. The present book contributes to the forming of an idea of Post-modern reason inspired by a constellation of Aristotelian concepts, such as prudence (phronesis), practical truth (aletheia praktike), science in act (episteme en energeiai), metaphor (metaphora), similarity (homoiosis) and the imitation-creation pair (mimesis-poiesis). They all form an interconnected network and together they make up an idea of reason that may prove suitable for the present. These concepts offer the most promising basis for undertaking a series of urgent reconciliations: of facts and values, of means and ends, of theoretical and practical reason, of intelligence and emotion. Aristotle's notions could help solve many dualisms of modern times. He offers a third way between identity and difference in ontology and politics, between algorithm and anarchism in methodology, between naïve realism and plain relativism in epistemology, between equivocity and univocity in language, between Enlightenment and Romanticism in culture... On the way, this shift facilitates the relationships between science, arts and ethics - the three parts of the sphere of culture which Modernity had separated - as well as the integration of the sphere of culture itself with the world of life.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.
Science, Worldviews and Education.Michael R. Matthews - 2014 - In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1585-1635.
Cave 2.0. The dualistic roots of transhumanism.Alfredo Marcos & Moisés Pérez Marcos - 2019 - Scientia et Fides 7 (2):23-40.
Metaphors as models: Towards a typology of metaphor in ancient science.Marcel Humar - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (3):1-26.
Frequency and Content of the Last Fifty Years of Papers on Aristotle’s Writings on Biological Phenomena.Christopher F. Sharpley & Clemens Koehn - forthcoming - Journal of the History of Biology:1-23.
Similar books and articles
Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism From Rousseau to Foucault.Stephen Ronald Craig Hicks - 2004 - Scholargy.
Constructive Postmodernism: Toward Renewal in Cultural and Literary Studies.Martin Schiralli - 1999 - Bergin & Garvey.
Postmodernism’s Use and Abuse of Nietzsche.Ken Gemes - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):337-360.
Postmodern Rationality, Social Criticism, and Religion.Henry L. Ruf - 2005 - Paragon House.
Postmodern Music/Postmodern Thought.Judith Irene Lochhead & Joseph Henry Auner (eds.) - 2002 - Routledge.
Existentialism and Postmodernism. Continuities, Breaks, and Some Consequences for Medical Theory.Dirk Richter - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
The Routledge Critical Dictionary of Postmodern Thought.Stuart Sim (ed.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Nihilism and the Postmodern in Vattimo's Nietzsche.Ashley Woodward - 2002 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):51-67.