Law and Philosophy 18 (5):447-460 (1999)
The paper explains and differentiates the concept of `fact' in the legal setting. Fact and evidence, fact/falsity distinguished; fact and law considered -- a real difference or a pragmatic device? Questions of fact and degree considered, in themselves and in the context of jury trial and of appeals. Primary fact, factual inferences from primary fact, questions of classification of fact are considered. Whether inference is supported by evidence, and whether classification is correct may be questions of law. Issues of fact and opinion, fact and comment, relative to freedom of speech, defamation etc: no clear distinction available. Legal problems concerning absence of workable distinctions.
|Keywords||fact evidence truth statement degree (question of) jury appeal primary fact inference classification opinion comment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
An Ontology of Physical Causation as a Basis for Assessing Causation in Fact and Attributing Legal Responsibility.Jos Lehmann & Aldo Gangemi - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (3):301-321.
Some Remarks on Wall's "a Fact is a Fact is a Fact".Stephen C. Pepper - 1973 - Zygon 8 (2):133-134.
Causation in AI and Law.Jos Lehmann, Joost Breuker & Bob Brouwer - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):279-315.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #315,800 of 2,171,692 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,692 )
How can I increase my downloads?