Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):36 – 50 (2009)

Abstract
Plagiarism is increasingly evident in business and academia. Though links between demographic, personality, and situational factors have been found, previous research has not used actual plagiarism behavior as a criterion variable. Previous research on academic dishonesty has consistently used self-report measures to establish prevalence of dishonest behavior. In this study we use actual plagiarism behavior to establish its prevalence, as well as relationships between integrity-related personal selection and workplace deviance measures. This research covers new ground in two respects: (a) That the academic dishonesty literature is subject to revision using criterion variables to avoid self bias and social desirability issues and (b) we establish the relationship between actual academic dishonesty and potential workplace deviance/white-collar crime.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/10508420802623666
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,608
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-01

Total views
94 ( #102,805 of 2,386,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #556,216 of 2,386,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes