History and Theory 37 (1):14–39 (1998)
Everyone with their feet on the ground admits that in the physical sciences there has been progress. One can debate the niceties. The hard rock is that our ability to predict and control natural events and processes is greater now than it has ever been. And there has been astonishing technological fallout
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Progress as a Demarcation Criterion for the Sciences.Paul M. Quay - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (2):154-170.
The Irreducibility of Progress: Kant's Account of the Relationship Between Morality and History.Axel Honneth - 2007 - Critical Horizons 8 (1):1-17.
The Weaknesses of Strong Inference.William O'Donohue & Jeffrey A. Buchanan - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:1 - 20.
Contributions Toward a Theory of Storms: Historical Knowing and Historical Progress in Kant and Benjamin.Max Pensky - 2010 - Philosophical Forum 41 (1):149-174.
Lacunae, Empirical Progress and Semantic Tableaux.Atocha Aliseda - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):169-189.
Historical Progress and the Dead End of the Mobilization Economy.A. P. Butenko - 1991 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 30 (3):61-82.
Scientific Progress as Accumulation of Knowledge: A Reply to Rowbottom.Alexander Bird - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):279-281.
N-Rays and the Semantic View of Scientific Progress.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):277-278.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #280,798 of 2,158,132 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #359,001 of 2,158,132 )
How can I increase my downloads?