Phronesis 44 (4):300-325 (1999)

Margaret Graver
Dartmouth College
The concept of o or "pre-emotions" is known not only to the Roman Stoics and Christian exegetes but also to Philo of Alexandria. Philo also supplies the term o at QGen 1.79. As Philo cannot have derived what he knows from Seneca (despite his visit to Rome in 39), nor from Cicero, who also mentions the point, he must have found it in older Stoic writings. The o concept, rich in implications for the voluntariness and phenomenology of the passions proper, is thus confirmed for the Hellenistic period. It is not to be expected that Philo's handling of this or any concept will necessarily conform to the usage of his Stoic sources. His evidence is nonetheless of great value where it coincides with that of other witnesses. In QGen 4.73 the emphasis falls upon involuntariness and the mechanisms of impression and assent as in Epictetus fr. 9. The o saves the virtuous person's insusceptibility to emotion exactly as it does for the Stoic spokesman in Gellius NA 19.1; this point is of some interest in view of the Christological use of this concept in Origen and Didymus. QGen 1.55 and 3.56 indicate that the occurrence of the o is dependent upon uncertainty, and further, that for Philo, as for Seneca in Ira 2.3.4, a thought not acted upon can count as a o. In QGen 4.15-17 and 1.79, Philo indicates that hope and perhaps laughter may be related to joy as o to o; these assertions are not paralleled in extant Stoic texts. Further, in QGen 2.57, he names "biting and contraction" as the fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685289960464610
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle's De Motu Animalium.D. W. Hamlyn - 1980 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (120):246.
Die Stoa: Geschichte einer Geistigen Bewegung.D. J. Allan & Max Pohlenz - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):269.
Seneca and Stoic Orthodoxy.John M. Rist - 1987 - In Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie. De Gruyter. pp. 1993-2013.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Plotinus’ Unaffectable Soul.Christopher Noble - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51:231-281.
The Possibility of Psychic Conflict in Seneca's De Ira.Corinne Gartner - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):213-233.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Italian Studies on Philo of Alexandria.Francesca Calabi (ed.) - 2003 - Brill Academic Publishers.
Philo of Alexandria : An Annotated Bibliography 2000.D. T. Runia - 2003 - In David T. Runia, Gregory E. Sterling & Hindy Najman (eds.), The Studia Philonica Annual. Brown University. pp. 109-137.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #594,047 of 2,419,524 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #350,791 of 2,419,524 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes